The BRICS nations — Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and new partners — have been discussing a new payment system aimed at reducing the dependence on the U.S. dollar and the SWIFT system.
The initiative, sometimes referred to as BRICS Pay, relies on a decentralized and interoperable network enabling cross-border transactions in local currencies.
Motivation: Sovereignty, Sanction Resistance, Multipolar Finance
Both political and financial forces drive the BRICS Pay initiative. Many BRICS nations view Western-run networks — especially SWIFT — as potential vulnerabilities, particularly during periods of sanctions.
In Kazan, during the 2024 summit, Vladimir Putin called for a new global payment system to fight what he called the “weaponization” of the dollar. However, other members remain unsure how far they want to push against the dollar’s power, concerned that it could put their own economies at risk.
Architecture: Decentralized, Node‑Based, Interoperable
Each BRICS nation runs its own node, which will make the system decentralized while maintaining seamless communication. A preliminary demonstration was held in Moscow in late 2024, showing basic messaging functions.
The code is claimed to be open‑source, and there are apparently no required fees for moves. The initiative aims to integrate with existing systems, such as Russia’s SPFS, China’s CIPS, India’s UPI, and Brazil’s Pix. All this takes place within a global financial system dominated by the U.S. dollar, with the euro trailing in distance, and their relationship is hedged by the EURUSD pair. Meanwhile, currency watchers also note how shifts in GBPUSD reflect broader sentiment toward Western currencies — a useful barometer for gauging the dollar’s relative strength as BRICS explores its own payment pathways.
Currently, the initiative remains in a testing or planning stage. Links between SPFS and other national systems are only partially functional, with unresolved issues surrounding message formats, security, and regulatory standards.
Internal splits and technical snags also complicate the situation, while the dollar stays deeply rooted. Moreover, the political aims of BRICS members differ. Russia and China push hard for alternatives, yet India and Brazil tend to stay cautious, concerned that a full break could disrupt vital trade relationships.
Furthermore, regulatory alignment can take years, making coordination even more challenging.
Making different systems work together is not easy.
It also means keeping messages secure and ensuring compliance with AML or KYC regulations, which can pose significant challenges. On the financial side, using local currencies for cross-border trade can lead to exchange-rate fluctuations, liquidity shortages, and price instability. These factors may discourage large corporations, which tend to favor the relative steadiness of the U.S. dollar.
Despite ongoing discussions about “de-dollarization”, U.S. currency still accounted for about 58 % of global reserves in late 2024. Analysts at JPMorgan report a tiny drop, yet the deep markets, worldwide use and trust are likely to preserve its dominance for years to come.
Outlook: gradual adoption, parallel systems, fragmentation
BRICS Pay is not likely to replace SWIFT in the near future. It could start by focusing on specific cases — such as oil trading between Brazil and Russia or bank settlements within the alliance — and handling only selected transactions at first. Given that global oil is still priced mainly in U.S. dollars, fluctuations in oil prices could significantly influence the demand for such a system and test how effectively BRICS Pay can support energy trade without dollar settlement.
If the network proves to be reliable, efficient, and trustworthy, it could evolve into a complementary channel rather than a direct substitute. That would add more layers to the world’s payment scene, making it a bit fragmented with overlapping platforms.
Still, a complete departure from the dollar over the next decade appears doubtful without significant shifts in global finance and international policy.
At this stage, the journey remains tangled by geopolitical splits and technical hurdles, and the US dollar maintains its grip. For now, it feels more like a dream than a credible alternative system. Yet even limited adoption could signal the early stages of a slow, structural rebalancing in global finance.
